In today’s digital era, subscriber count can be misleading if not paired with actual engagement metrics.
We analyzed two of Indiaโs biggest YouTube channels โ Narendra Modi and Dhruv Rathee โ to understand the gap between subscriber numbers and actual viewer activity.
๐ Engagement Calculations Breakdown
Letโs dive into the raw data and estimate how many of these subscribers are actually active โ and how many may be inactive or fake.
๐ธ Channel A โ Narendra Modi
Subscribers: 28.5 Million
Expected Real Views (5% industry avg.):
28.5M ร 0.05 = 1,425,000Actual Views on Recent Video: 7,700
View Reach %:
(7,700 รท 28,500,000) โ 0.027%๐ก Active Subscriber Estimate:
Assuming active users view 1 in 5 videos:
7,700 ร 5 = 38,500 active subscribersโ Inactive/Fake Subscribers:
28,500,000 โ 38,500 = 28,461,500
๐ธ Channel B โ Dhruv Rathee
Subscribers: 29.1 Million
Expected Real Views (5%):
29.1M ร 0.05 = 1,455,000Actual Views (recent video in 8 days): 18 Million
View Reach %:
(18M รท 29.1M) โ 61.8%๐ก Active Subscriber Estimate:
Given the high and consistent viewership:
Estimated 20Mโ25M engaged subscribersโ Inactive/Fake Subscribers:
29.1M โ 22M โ 7.1M (approx.)
โ Final Engagement Estimates (Rounded)
Channel | Subscribers | Active Subs | Inactive/Fake Subs | Fake % |
---|---|---|---|---|
Narendra Modi | 28.5M | ~38K | ~28.46M | ~99.9% โ |
Dhruv Rathee | 29.1M | ~22M | ~7M | ~24% โ |
๐ง What Does This Tell Us?
Dhruv Rathee has a remarkably high engagement rate, indicating a genuine, active following.
Narendra Modiโs channel, despite its massive subscriber base, shows alarmingly low engagement โ which raises serious concerns about subscriber authenticity or possible algorithmic suppression.